Archived: EDITORIAL: Bill To Open Dependency Court Hearings Killed: That’s a Shame


A bill in the state legislature, AB 73, which would have opened dependency court hearings to the public, was put on hold Tuesday, and that’s a shame in our view.

The bill, authored by Assemblyman Mike Feuer (D-Los Angeles) was one of the few solutions under consideration to improve the outcomes for children in the child welfare system that would have allowed greater transparency in how we treat children who find themselves in the system through no fault of their own.

Too often, children are returned to parents whose actions were the cause for them being placed in the system in the first place, only to be returned to foster care when those same parents prove once again to be incapable of providing a safe and healthy home.

Too many children are subjected to further abuse and neglect by the very system that is supposed to protect them, but which is overwhelmed by the large number of cases and the view by the courts and the welfare system that says children should, if possible, always be reunited to their parents. The same mantra that causes them to over and over again overlook or excuse questionable, if not darn right risky and potentially dangerous behavior by biological parents.

Hearings in dependency court are not open to the public, allowing parents, caretakers and foster parents to effectively escape public scrutiny; Feuer’s bill would have changed that in some cases. Opponents to the measure said that children would be re-traumatized by the details of their cases being discussed in open court. We disagree. AB 73 would have left it up to a judge’s discretion to close the courtroom in sensitive situations.

We believe there has to be a way to protect the privacy of children and families by keeping their identities confidential when there is only one incidence of contact with the welfare system, but if contacts continue to occur we think, for the protection of all concerned, especially children, those situations should be resolved in public.

The details of further contacts should be public but the identities could be kept confidential, the way the names of witnesses can be kept secret.

So, while the legislature has effectively killed AB 73 for this legislative session, it is our hope that the measure will soon get another hearing.

Posted - Copyright © 2022 Eastern Group Publications, Inc.

Print This Post Print This Post

1 Comment

  1. RE: “Too often, children are returned to parents whose actions were the cause for them being placed in the system in the first place…”

    We believe that the opposite is the TRUTH- There is a pandemic of parents being falsely accused and maliciously prosecuted by this system.

    The CPS agents have no morals or ethics, take no Oath to support the Constitution, and are highly unlikely to be prosecuted for their routine perjury.

    While the term “Best Interest of the Child” gets completely worn out in this process, the truth is, what the child thinks and wants doesn’t matter.

    “There is no system ever devised by mankind that is guaranteed to rip husband and wife or father, mother and child apart so bitterly than our present Family Court System.”- Judge Brian Lindsay Retired Supreme Court Judge, New York, New York

    “There is something bad happening to our children in family courts today that is causing them more harm than drugs, more harm than crime and even more harm than child molestation.” Judge Watson L. White Superior Court Judge, Cobb County, Georgia

    “The best interests test has long been the subject of academic as well as judicial criticism for being indeterminate, providing little guidance on how to weigh the different needs of individual children, especially as they change over time” -Robert H. Mnookin, Child-Custody Adjudication: Judicial Functions in the Face of Indeterminacy, 39 Law & Contemp. Probs., 226, 257 (Summer 1975).

    “Best interests operates as an empty vessel into which adult perceptions and prejudices are poured.” –Hillary Rodham, Children Under the Law, 43 Harv. Ed. Rev. 487, 513 (1973).

    Leonard Henderson, co-founder
    American Family Rights
    “Until Every Child Comes Home”©
    “The Voice of America’s Families”©

Leave A Reply

Comments are intended to further discussion on the article topic. EGPNews reserves the right to not publish, edit or remove comments that contain vulgarities, foul language, personal attacks, racists, sexist, homophobic or other offensive terminology or that contain solicitations, spam, or that threaten harm of any sort. EGPNews will not approve comments that call for or applaud the death, injury or illness of any person, regardless of their public status. Questions regarding this policy should be e-mailed to